
SAMPLE CHAPTER: Conveyancing ModuleTaking instructions and establishing who is your clientWhile many conveyancing practitioners will view the identification of the party or parties for whom they act as a straightforward matter, the large number of professional negligence claims that arise from the area indicates the importance of clarifying for whom you act and taking clear instructions from the outset. The position becomes more complex when acting for a number of individuals, and practitioners need to beware of conflicts of interests both at the outset and throughout the conveyancing transaction. Conflicts of interest commonly arise when advising joint owners in a transaction, for example where a property is being purchased as tenants in common with a declaration of trust to be drafted, the co-owners will need to take independent legal advice given the dangers of a conflict of interest arising in this situation. Real life examples
Case 1A firm was instructed by a longstanding client (for whom they were acting at the time in a matrimonial dispute) to sell his business and also to re-mortgage the jointly owned matrimonial home. Although the business included a leasehold property held in joint names, the firm took no steps to contact the wife or to obtain her instructions. They accepted authorisation from the husband alone to sign the sale contract on behalf of his wife. In relation to the re-mortgage the firm also took instructions from the husband alone. On receipt of the mortgage offer they wrote to the husband and wife at the former matrimonial home (despite knowing that the wife no longer lived there) informing them that they would both have to attend at the firm’s office to execute the mortgage deed in accordance with the specific lender’s requirements. Instead, the husband found another lender with no such requirements and subsequently forged his wife’s signature on the mortgage deed the firm had sent to the couple, again at the former matrimonial home, for execution. The wife subsequently made a claim against the firm and the firm refused to acknowledge that she was a client or that they owed her a duty of care. Case 2The claimant was a longstanding tenant of a council property. Her partner moved in with her and he instructed the firm of solicitors to purchase the property in their joint names. He provided the purchase monies. The claimant’s contribution was her entitlement to the discount on the purchase price. The claimant’s partner wanted a declaration of trust giving him sole beneficial ownership. The firm prepared the conveyance to the couple as beneficial tenants in common. They also drafted a declaration of trust in accordance with the male partner’s instructions. At no time did they see the claimant on her own to explain the declaration of trust and the fact that it was disadvantageous to her. They did send a letter recommending that she seek independent legal advice, but the letter was addressed to her partner; the claimant never saw it! Some years later, the claimant moved out of the house and made a claim against the solicitors. She alleged that when acting on the purchase there had been a conflict of interest and they had failed to advise her to take independent legal advice. Sensitive to their own shortcomings, the firm, wholly unconvincingly, alleged in reply that the claimant had never been their client – they had never acted for her, only for her partner! Case 3Prior to the involvement of the firm, an 82-year-old man had purchased his council house at a discounted price of £50,000 and his daughter agreed to guarantee payment of the mortgage on his behalf. The daughter purported to instruct the firm on a re-mortgage of the property and transfer of ownership from the sole name of her father to the joint names of her father, herself and her boyfriend. The re-mortgage was for £100,000. The firm also acted for the lender. The daughter instructed the firm that:
The firm neither sought nor received any instructions direct from the father or the boyfriend; there were no discussions, attendances or correspondence with them. All instructions came from the daughter alone; the firm accepted as authority, and acted on, a letter signed by the daughter stating that she was acting on behalf of, and with the consent of, her father and boyfriend. The firm never sent a client care letter to the father nor did they advise him to seek independent legal advice, even though he was purportedly transferring his solely owned property to himself, his daughter and her boyfriend as joint tenants. The firm sent all correspondence, including the mortgage deed and transfer forms for signature, addressed to all three parties at the daughter’s address. When the re-mortgage monies were received, the firm paid the balance direct to the daughter. It transpired that the father was wholly
unaware that the re-mortgage was for a figure twice that of his existing
mortgage. His daughter had told him that the When the father made a claim against the solicitors who had purported to act on his behalf, their response was that they could not be expected to detect the fraud of the daughter! Case 4A client who jointly owned a property with her mother instructed the firm to transfer the mother’s interest in the property to her. The firm sent a letter to the mother at the address of the property advising her to take independent legal advice. When the client returned the transfer to her solicitors, they accepted it as having been signed by the mother. Solicitors acting on behalf of the mother subsequently claimed that she had no knowledge of the transaction – she is blind, had been living in a nursing home for five years when the transfer was allegedly signed by her and, furthermore, at the time lacked the mental capacity to deal with her own affairs. Issues to considerReferences to the Council of Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook are to the online edition of 6 May 2005. 1.1 Confirming instructions to actThe client may instruct you by telephone or in person or your first intimation may be that you receive a copy of the memorandum of an agreed sale from the estate agents. In any event write to the client confirming your instructions and setting out the terms upon which you will be acting. Do you have a client care letter/standard terms of engagement? Do you need to limit your retainer in any way to exclude, for example, matters such as advice on taxation? Unless you do so, your duty will extend to advising on taxation. 1.2 Estate agent’s particularsObtain and confirm correctness of the particulars with the client. Both parties will need to ensure that the heads of terms are accurately reflected in the contract and are consistent with the seller’s title. 1.3 Taking instructions on the transactionIn addition to setting out the terms of your retainer, you need to take instructions from the client on the transaction eg timescale, fixtures, fittings, deposit etc. Do this in an interview with the client and have a checklist so as to reduce the risk of anything being forgotten during the interview. The Law Society Conveyancing Handbook has checklists which you may use (which should be subject to continuous updating and review). After the interview, confirm in writing the instructions given at the interview. 1.4 Instructions from the client’s agentIs the person who is giving you instructions the client, or the agent of the client eg a son acting as the agent of his elderly mother in the sale of her house? You must treat the mother as the client and as soon as possible see her to satisfy yourself that she knows of the transaction and is content for her son to give instructions. See the mother alone to establish that the son is not seeking to exercise any undue influence over her. See her again when it is time for her to sign the contract. 1.5 Where the client consists of more than one personIf the client consists of more than one person, then obtain instructions from all of them in writing. You must treat each individual as a separate client and meet all of them. Consider:
1.6 Checking the identity of the clientIs the buyer known to you or another member of the firm? If not, you should have in place a procedure for establishing the identity of the person claiming to be your client. If acting for a lender paragraph 3 of the CML Handbook requires the conveyancer to carry out certain checks – seeing original documentation such as a passport, keeping a copy on file, and ensuring that the signature on it matches the signature on the mortgage deed. You must be aware of money laundering and mortgage fraud. The Law Society has produced Money Laundering: Guidance for Solicitors, Money Laundering Warning Card (Blue Card), Property Fraud Warning Card II (Green Card) and Mortgage fraud – variation in purchase price. 1.7 Establishing who will occupy the propertyWill anyone other than the buyer, who will be the legal owner, occupy the property after completion? Ask the buyer to confirm that any information in the mortgage instructions about the occupants of the property after completion is correct. The lender will expect you to obtain a consent from all such occupants aged 17 or over in which they postpone in favour of the lender any interest which they have in the property. If in doubt about the information provided by the buyer, then see paragraph 7.4 of the CML Handbook – generally you must report your doubts to the lender if the buyer agrees. If the buyer does not consent, you must cease to act for the lender. 1.8 Advising guarantors and adult occupiersAre you satisfied that you can act for these parties or is there a conflict of interest which requires them to take separate legal advice? An example is where a spouse obtains a mortgage to fund their business and the lender requires the other spouse to act as a co-mortgagor or guarantor of the loan. In general, the CML Handbook says that you cannot act for such parties unless part 2 of the Handbook permits it. The House of Lords in Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Etridge [2001] UKHL 44 set out the ‘golden rules’ regarding how a solicitor should act in this situation. 1.9 Buyer and lender – separate duties owedBe aware that, although you may be acting for both lender and buyer, you owe separate duties to both which may conflict. If this happens, then you will be unable to act for both eg if your duty to the lender requires you to advise it of information which the buyer has given you but the buyer refuses to consent to this. In such an instance you must cease to act for the lender.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General risk management
Taking instructions and establishing who is your client
Purchase price
Plans and boundaries
Deducing title and drafting the contract for the seller
Preliminary enquiries
Searches on behalf of the buyer
Planning
Building regulations
Title investigation
Easements and covenants
Leasehold acquisitions
New properties
Contract
Joint ownership
Completion
Post-completion